![]() ![]() ![]() Like modern day homeopathy, anti-vaccine, snake oil, etc People back then honestly believed masturbating was a mental sickness, bad behavior (and some families on earth, still hold that attitude today). Then our "hero" Jake doesn't tell Sadie that his threats of violence are the reason the divorce was granted - and flowers, candy, celebration planning.Īnd the clothes-pin - I'm not even sure if that's supposed to be some nonsense treatment to keep boys from masturbating. Not some pre-meditated violence like our "hero" Jake threatens against the husband. The psychology threshold crossing of marriage. But Sadie's husband is far less simple, his violence came out during the height of sexual chemicals, society confrontation, and an emotional breakdown. The previous guy Jake killed was a pre-meditating asshole who regarded wives as cattle. How does that make Jake any better than the husband and his violence (hitting his wife in reaction to the sex insanity)? A pile of violence (and threats of violence) over sex - and no serious talking or condemnation of violence. Jake threatens to beat Sadie's husband and leave him in a ditch - plus tell the society. And Jake is pure hate in his newly discovered knowledge of the abuse problem. The husband's parents, Sadie's mother, his own self and Sadie. Jake is the first person outside of 5 that knew of the problem. ![]() In a society heavily afraid to talk and write books about sex I thought the Catcher in the Rye prostitution content attitude by the Principal was very revealing of the writer's intention. Our hero Jake attacks the guy for the shit his parents did to him and educated him in childhood? Sadie's husband was probably a total virgin, and freaked out. I thought the follow-up scene, the car confrontation between the two men (Jake and Sadie's husband), was very revealing of how complex the story tellers want to be. But the reassurance in this forum is all too sweet, I'm so glad that not only do i now have a little more knowledge (useless knowledge about how fucking dumb people are with their children's penises), but i also can rest assured that I'm not the only one ruffled up by Sadie's remark. and nothing, my findings from the hours of research were lacking on account of the episode being so new, there were no forums discussing this urgent matter and the sun was beginning to rise, so i finally gave up. I read up on more than 20 episode recaps, studied the story characters, familiarized myself with Stephan Kings kinks, typed in "Clothespins on dicks" more than 50 times, and questioned my own sanity at least 10 times. To be totally honest i spent almost 4 hours last night consumed by this scene, researching the useless clothespin remark said by Sadie and the reason for it. (#s "Stephen King wrote 11/22/63")Īfter watching the clothespin scene late last night (around 12:30 or so, somewhere after the episode aired) I was absolutely baffled by Sadie's claims and I had to watch the scene 3 to 5 times just to make sure I didn't miss any lines that would explain why John Clayton possibly had a clothespin on his dick. Please use spoiler tags when discussing book material.Episode DiscussionsĮpisode 6 - Happy Birthday, Lee Harvey Oswald Abrams, Stephen King, Bridget Carpenter and Bryan Burk.Ī teacher is presented with the chance to travel back in time to 1960 and attempts to prevent the assassination of JFK, and becomes attached to the life he makes in the past. 11.22.63 is an American thriller limited series based on the book 11/22/63 by Stephen King. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |